Sometimes I think to myself, how much of a nerd could one person be to talk about keyboard layouts. Well, let’s face it. I’m a nerd.
Chances are if you’re reading this, you’re at your computer and if you look down you will see the exact same thing as in the picture. Am I right? You are using QWERTY. Now I will not attempt to go in to the whole history of keyboard layouts and how many are out there.
You can read those in the following articles mentioned below.
In a previous article, Good Bye Colemak… It’s Been Fun, I mentioned that after more than a year of learning Colemak, just when I was I was getting to grips with the layout, I decided that for certain reasons, I would be switching over to QWERTY as my primary keyboard layout.
So is QWERTY the best option for me? I’m still not certain. In the article, I mentioned that I would be like to be universally competent, no matter what system I have in front of me. So being able to touch-type on QWERTY is something that would not go in vain.
However, it has been a year since I switched to QWERTY and I’m still not able to type a single word properly without making so many errors. Maybe I’m thinking or reading too much into it. So far the only real amount of muscle memory that I’ve managed to get familiar with is the “Backspace” key on my keyboard. So frustrating.. 😦
Frankly I can’t say that I’m surprised. After experiencing layout much more comfortable and easier, I suppose that my hands are sort of frustrated with me & my choices. They seem to have a mind of their own now. Haha.
Don’t believe me how bad QWERTY can be?
Go to this site: Keyboard Layout Analyser
Paste a large paragraph of text and see where QWERTY comes in. You will see what I’m talking about.
The biggest reason for anyone to use alternative layouts is to reduce injuries caused by excessive computer usage. While there is no real definitive proof that the QWERTY layout is the main cause of Carpal tunnel and RSI, there are many typists who suffer from said injuries and have seen definitive relief by switching. I’ve always believed that prevention is better than cure. So I think that if you are going to be using only your personal system, and you work long hours typing away at the computer, then rather than risk injury, you should consider switching. This is just a general opinion though. Not a suggestion.
Of course I’m not sure that my typing needs leave me vulnerable to anything. However I’m still keen on getting into programming and that would need for me to type more than what I do now.
When I initially started to learn touch typing, one of the main reasons why I preferred to get into the alternate layout is that I’ve always believed that if there was a better way of doing something, that would the best way to do it. Regardless if it was experimental or going against the norm, I would do it. I’m not one to follow the crowd, just because of popular opinion. So I started with Dvorak. Then moved to Colemak.
Anyways with the trouble that I’m having now with typing on QWERTY, I’m thinking whether in the long run if I would be better off with an alternative layouts. Logging my experience with Colemak.com forums, I often get replies from veteran Colemak users saying that I should switch back. Why go through the hassle? I went through enough trying to get used to Colemak and just when I was making progress, I switched again.
When I switched to QWERTY, I imagined that I would be using more different systems on a regular basis. Plus learning the standard layout would allow me to be more universally competent. I’ve explained my reasons in the linked article above. But it seems the case that I’m only using systems that have been assigned to me on a permanent / long term basis. And at home, I have Albert.
So would switching back to an alternative layout be better for me? If Yes, then which one. Colemak is certainly the most modern and logically the best. But at the moment, its not wide spread on every single computer. If I do switch, I think that I would be using Dvorak. Apparently it comes in second place when compared with Colemak, but those who know me, know that I alway vote for the under-dogs.
I’ve had this debate before and having tried out them both, I would say that if I need the keyboard shortcuts, surely Colemak is the better bet. But for me, when I was learning Dvorak, I actually found it much more easier than Colemak or QWERTY. I think its the hand alteration. It works better on me and I was typing proficiently without any mistakes in hardly any time at all. Another thing that Dvorak has is that it is ready available as an optional layout on any computer, any OS & it takes only a few clicks to switch. So if I do need to use different system for a length of time, I can do so easily without any problems.
Colemak is still not standard on Windows which is what I would mostly be using when I’m not at home.
So… am I throwing in the towel for Dvorak?
QWERTY is no picnic, but I would not be giving it justice if I give up just now. So the answer is No.. People who know me know that I will not let technology beat me. I’m not a defeatist.
When I was learning Colemak, it took me 2 years to be able to type a coherent sentence without a single mistake; just as fast as I would be on my hunt and peck method with QWERTY prior to that. This compared with just 3 months required on Dvorak.
Seeing that QWERTY is not as ergonomic as Colemak, it will probably take more time than 2 years for me to get proficient with it. I’m making progress; snail-like progress, but progress just the same. I just probably need to get into a proper typing program and really focus. Otherwise, I’m just going nowhere fast.